|
|
|
| 您当前位置：情景会话首页 > 会话搜索 |
|
|
1.中国象棋
I think chess is more reasonable. You see, each side has eight pawns, a larger number than that of the soldiers in xiangqi. A true battle should be like that. Soldiers should outnumber the commanders.
我觉得还是国际象棋比较有道理.你看.每方拥有8个士兵.比象棋的兵多吧?真正的战役就应该这样嘛.士兵总得比指挥官多吧?
2.中国象棋
Quite right. And unlike the soldiers in xiangqi, the pawns in chess can promote once they reach the furthest rank. It is very agreeable to grant merits to people with good performance.
太对了.不像象棋里的兵.国际象棋的兵只要到达了对方的战线.就可以升级.论功行赏.多好啊!
|
|
| |
|
