1.Methods: Members of experimental group are 43 patients of severe craniocerebral injury (Glasgow Coma Scales,GCS≤6) with multiple trauma and ISS (Injury Severity Score) scope equal to or up to 16. 43 patients were divided into simple severe trauma group (group B) and severe trauma with haemorrhagic shock (group C);
方法:实验组研究对象是格拉斯哥昏迷评分(Glasgow Coma Scales,GCS)等于或小于6分的43例重度颅脑损伤合并其他部位多发伤的患者,其损伤严重程度评分(Injury Severity Score,ISS)均等于或大于16分。 根据是否伴有失血性休克将患者分为2组:重创无休克组(B组)和重创伴休克组(C组);
2.Objective To assess the accuracy of three clinical diagnostic criteria systems [APACHEⅡ,Ranson and Balthazar CT severity index(CTSI)]in predicting outcome of patients with acute pancreatitis.
目的研究APACHEⅡ、Ranson、Balthazar CT严重指数(CT severity index,CTSI)三种临床评分标准对轻症及重症急性胰腺炎(AP)的评估价值。
3.On the base of the Palmer Drought Severity Model of America and the modificated Palmer Drought Severity Model(1986),we further modificate the Palmer Drought Severity Model in the following aspects; ?
在美国帕默尔旱度模式和我国1985年修正的帕默尔旱度模式的基础上，针对其中存在的问题，从建模选用较多站点、可能蒸散计算采用彭曼—蒙特斯公式和土壤田间有效持水量进一步准确划分等三个方面进一步修正了帕默尔旱度模式。
4.In the complication group,both the physiological scores and the operative severity scores of POSSUM scoring system were significantly higher than the no complication group ( 22.0 ± 4.1 vs 20.1±3.9 in pysiological score and 11.7±4.3 vs 10.3±3.5 in operative severity score, P < 0.05 ).
生理学评分 2 2 .0± 4.1,手术侵袭度评分 11.7± 4.3。 无并发症组 137例 ,男 12 9例 ,女 8例。
5.Objective:To compare the value of trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) and a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) in predicting the outcome of patients suffered from severe craniocerebral injury.
目的 :比较 TRISS法和 ASCOT法对重度颅脑损伤患者结局的预测价值。
6.The severity of proteinuria was not correpondent to the severity of diabetic retinopathy.
蛋白尿的严重性与网膜变化的严重程度并不一致。
7.Methods: We retrospectively investigated l 039 cases of patients who we treated in the past 10 years. Besides, we evaluated the severity of trauma for every patient with ASCOT(a severity characterization of trauma) and compared with the outcomes of treatment.
方法:对近10年我科收治的胸外伤病人1 039例进行回顾性研究,用创伤严重度特征评分法(ASCOT)对这些病人进行评分,与治疗结果进行对比。
8.Objective:To investigate the predictive value for head injury with trauma revised injury severity score(TRISS) and a severity characterization of trauma(ASCOT).
目的 :探讨创伤严重程度评分 (TRISS)和创伤严重程度特征评分 (ASCOT)两种评分法在单纯颅脑外伤中的评估价值。
9.These models were divided randomly into four group according to the different ischemic time(3d,7d,14d and 21d). Neurological severity score (NSS), triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining and HE staining were adopted to observe dynamically the syndrome of neurological severity, the volume of cerebral infarction and the pathological changes.
并在造模后将动物按缺血时间随机分为3d、7d、14d和21d组,采用神经功能缺损评分(NSS)、TTC染色与HE染色动态观察神经功能缺损征、脑梗死体积及观察病理改变情况。
10.Results: Analyzed by SAS software, the model between ISS( X ) and DDDs( Y ) was established: Y =16.99ln X -0.53. r 2=0.663 7, P <0.01.It showed that in the particular scope of ISS, the frequency of antibiotics administration rose up with the increase of the injury severity, and it tended to saturate as the severity went worse.
结果：建立了战伤严重度 I S S值和抗感染药品消耗 D D D数的数学模型，其关系式为： Y＝ 16．99ln X－ 0．53，决定系数r2 ＝ 0．663 7， P＜ 0．01。
